Towards Comprehensible Recommendation with Large Language Model Fine-tuning

August 11, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Yunze Luo, Yinjie Jiang, Gaode Chen, Xinghua Zhang, Jun Zhang, Jian Liang, Kaigui Bian arXiv ID 2508.07595 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Recommender systems have become increasingly ubiquitous in daily life. While traditional recommendation approaches primarily rely on ID-based representations or item-side content features, they often fall short in capturing the underlying semantics aligned with user preferences (e.g., recommendation reasons for items), leading to a semantic-collaborative gap. Recently emerged LLM-based feature extraction approaches also face a key challenge: how to ensure that LLMs possess recommendation-aligned reasoning capabilities and can generate accurate, personalized reasons to mitigate the semantic-collaborative gap. To address these issues, we propose a novel Content Understanding from a Collaborative Perspective framework (CURec), which generates collaborative-aligned content features for more comprehensive recommendations. \method first aligns the LLM with recommendation objectives through pretraining, equipping it with instruction-following and chain-of-thought reasoning capabilities. Next, we design a reward model inspired by traditional recommendation architectures to evaluate the quality of the recommendation reasons generated by the LLM. Finally, using the reward signals, CURec fine-tunes the LLM through RL and corrects the generated reasons to ensure their accuracy. The corrected reasons are then integrated into a downstream recommender model to enhance comprehensibility and recommendation performance. Extensive experiments on public benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of CURec over existing methods.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted