Mental Effort Estimation in Motion Exploration and Concept Generation Design Tasks using Inter-Band Relative Power Difference of EEG
August 14, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
G. Kalyan Ramana, Sumit Yempalle, Prasad S. Onkar
arXiv ID
2508.10353
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Cross-listed
stat.ME
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Conceptual design is a cognitively complex task, especially in the engineering design of products having relative motion between components. Designers prefer sketching as a medium for conceptual design and use gestures and annotations to represent such relative motion. Literature suggests that static representations of motion in sketches may not achieve the intended functionality when realised, because it primarily depends on the designers' mental capabilities for motion simulation. Thus, it is important to understand the cognitive phenomena when designers are exploring concepts of articulated products. The current work is an attempt to understand design neurocognition by categorising the tasks and measuring the mental effort involved in these tasks using EEG. The analysis is intended to validate design intervention tools to support the conceptual design involving motion exploration. A novel EEG-based metric, inter-Band Relative Power Difference (inter-BRPD), is introduced to quantify mental effort. A design experiment is conducted with 32 participants, where they have to perform one control task and 2 focus tasks corresponding to the motion exploration task (MET) and the concept generation task (CGT), respectively. EEG data is recorded during the 3 tasks, cleaned, processed and analysed using the MNE library in Python. It is observed from the results that inter-BRPD captures the essence of mental effort with half the number of conventionally used parameters. The reliability and efficacy of the inter-BRPD metric are also statistically validated against literature-based cognitive metrics. With these new insights, the study opens up possibilities for creating support for conceptual design and its evaluation.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted