Stress Detection from Multimodal Wearable Sensor Data
August 14, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Paul Schreiber, Beyza Cinar, Lennart Mackert, Maria Maleshkova
arXiv ID
2508.10468
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is a multi-modal, interdisciplinary field focused on designing, studying, and improving the interactions between people and computer systems. This involves the design of systems that can recognize, interpret, and respond to human emotions or stress. Developing systems to monitor and react to stressful events can help prevent severe health implications caused by long-term stress exposure. Currently, the publicly available datasets and standardized protocols for data collection in this domain are limited. Therefore, we introduce a multi-modal dataset intended for wearable affective computing research, specifically the development of automated stress recognition systems. We systematically review the publicly available datasets recorded in controlled laboratory settings. Based on a proposed framework for the standardization of stress experiments and data collection, we collect physiological and motion signals from wearable devices (e.g., electrodermal activity, photoplethysmography, three-axis accelerometer). During the experimental protocol, we differentiate between the following four affective/activity states: neutral, physical, cognitive stress, and socio-evaluative stress. These different phases are meticulously labeled, allowing for detailed analysis and reconstruction of each experiment. Meta-data such as body positions, locations, and rest phases are included as further annotations. In addition, we collect psychological self-assessments after each stressor to evaluate subjects' affective states. The contributions of this paper are twofold: 1) a novel multi-modal, publicly available dataset for automated stress recognition, and 2) a benchmark for stress detection with 89\% in a binary classification (baseline vs. stress) and 82\% in a multi-class classification (baseline vs. stress vs. physical exercise).
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted