Efficient and Verifiable Privacy-Preserving Convolutional Computation for CNN Inference with Untrusted Clouds

August 18, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Poster Volume β…  The 2025 Twenty-First International Conference on Intelligent Computing July 26-29, 2025 Ningbo, China

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jinyu Lu, Xinrong Sun, Yunting Tao, Tong Ji, Fanyu Kong, Guoqiang Yang arXiv ID 2508.12832 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 0 Venue Poster Volume β…  The 2025 Twenty-First International Conference on Intelligent Computing July 26-29, 2025 Ningbo, China Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The widespread adoption of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in resource-constrained scenarios has driven the development of Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) system. However, this approach is susceptible to privacy leakage, as the data sent from the client to the untrusted cloud server often contains sensitive information. Existing CNN privacy-preserving schemes, while effective in ensuring data confidentiality through homomorphic encryption and secret sharing, face efficiency bottlenecks, particularly in convolution operations. In this paper, we propose a novel verifiable privacy-preserving scheme tailored for CNN convolutional layers. Our scheme enables efficient encryption and decryption, allowing resource-constrained clients to securely offload computations to the untrusted cloud server. Additionally, we present a verification mechanism capable of detecting the correctness of the results with a success probability of at least $1-\frac{1}{\left|Z\right|}$. Extensive experiments conducted on 10 datasets and various CNN models demonstrate that our scheme achieves speedups ranging $26 \times$ ~ $\ 87\times$ compared to the original plaintext model while maintaining accuracy.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted