Power Stabilization for AI Training Datacenters

August 20, 2025 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Esha Choukse, Brijesh Warrier, Scot Heath, Luz Belmont, April Zhao, Hassan Ali Khan, Brian Harry, Matthew Kappel, Russell J. Hewett, Kushal Datta, Yu Pei, Caroline Lichtenberger, John Siegler, David Lukofsky, Zaid Kahn, Gurpreet Sahota, Andy Sullivan, Charles Frederick, Hien Thai, Rebecca Naughton, Daniel Jurnove, Justin Harp, Reid Carper, Nithish Mahalingam, Srini Varkala, Alok Gautam Kumbhare, Satyajit Desai, Venkatesh Ramamurthy, Praneeth Gottumukkala, Girish Bhatia, Kelsey Wildstone, Laurentiu Olariu, Ileana Incorvaia, Alex Wetmore, Prabhat Ram, Melur Raghuraman, Mohammed Ayna, Mike Kendrick, Ricardo Bianchini, Aaron Hurst, Reza Zamani, Xin Li, Michael Petrov, Gene Oden, Rory Carmichael, Tom Li, Apoorv Gupta, Pratikkumar Patel, Nilesh Dattani, Lawrence Marwong, Rob Nertney, Hirofumi Kobayashi, Jeff Liott, Miro Enev, Divya Ramakrishnan, Ian Buck, Jonah Alben arXiv ID 2508.14318 Category cs.AR: Hardware Architecture Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.DC Citations 6 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Large Artificial Intelligence (AI) training workloads spanning several tens of thousands of GPUs present unique power management challenges. These arise due to the high variability in power consumption during the training. Given the synchronous nature of these jobs, during every iteration there is a computation-heavy phase, where each GPU works on the local data, and a communication-heavy phase where all the GPUs synchronize on the data. Because compute-heavy phases require much more power than communication phases, large power swings occur. The amplitude of these power swings is ever increasing with the increase in the size of training jobs. An even bigger challenge arises from the frequency spectrum of these power swings which, if harmonized with critical frequencies of utilities, can cause physical damage to the power grid infrastructure. Therefore, to continue scaling AI training workloads safely, we need to stabilize the power of such workloads. This paper introduces the challenge with production data and explores innovative solutions across the stack: software, GPU hardware, and datacenter infrastructure. We present the pros and cons of each of these approaches and finally present a multi-pronged approach to solving the challenge. The proposed solutions are rigorously tested using a combination of real hardware and Microsoft's in-house cloud power simulator, providing critical insights into the efficacy of these interventions under real-world conditions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Hardware Architecture

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted