Lagrangian Simulation Volume-Based Contour Tree Simplification

August 20, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› 2025 IEEE Workshop on Topological Data Analysis and Visualization (TopoInVis)

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Domantas Dilys, Hamish Carr, Steven Boeing arXiv ID 2508.14339 Category cs.CG: Computational Geometry Cross-listed cs.DC, cs.DS Citations 0 Venue 2025 IEEE Workshop on Topological Data Analysis and Visualization (TopoInVis) Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Many scientific and engineering problems are modelled by simulating scalar fields defined either on space-filling meshes (Eulerian) or as particles (Lagrangian). For analysis and visualization, topological primitives such as contour trees can be used, but these often need simplification to filter out small-scale features. For parcel-based convective cloud simulations, simplification of the contour tree requires a volumetric measure rather than persistence. Unlike for cubic meshes, volume cannot be approximated by counting regular vertices. Typically, this is addressed by resampling irregular data onto a uniform grid. Unfortunately, the spatial proximity of parcels requires a high sampling frequency, resulting in a massive increase in data size for processing. We therefore extend volume-based contour tree simplification to parcel-in-cell simulations with a graph adaptor in Viskores (VTK-m), using Delaunay tetrahedralization of the parcel centroids as input. Instead of relying on a volume approximation by counting regular vertices -- as was done for cubic meshes -- we adapt the 2D area splines reported by Bajaj et al. 10.1145/259081.259279, and Zhou et al. 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2796555. We implement this in Viskores (formerly called VTK-m) as prefix-sum style hypersweeps for parallel efficiency and show how it can be generalized to compute any integrable property. Finally, our results reveal that contour trees computed directly on the parcels are orders of magnitude faster than computing them on a resampled grid, while also arguably offering better quality segmentation, avoiding interpolation artifacts.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computational Geometry

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Dynamic Planar Convex Hull

Riko Jacob, Gerth StΓΈlting Brodal

cs.CG πŸ› The 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2002. Proceedings. πŸ“š 240 cites 7 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted