zkPHIRE: A Programmable Accelerator for ZKPs over HIgh-degRee, Expressive Gates
August 22, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Alhad Daftardar, Jianqiao Mo, Joey Ah-kiow, Benedikt BΓΌnz, Siddharth Garg, Brandon Reagen
arXiv ID
2508.16738
Category
cs.AR: Hardware Architecture
Cross-listed
cs.CR
Citations
1
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) have emerged as a powerful tool for secure and privacy-preserving computation. ZKPs enable one party to convince another of a statement's validity without revealing anything else. This capability has profound implications in many domains, including machine learning, blockchain, image authentication, and electronic voting. Despite their potential, ZKPs have seen limited deployment because of their exceptionally high computational overhead, which manifests primarily during proof generation. To mitigate these overheads, a (growing) body of researchers has proposed hardware accelerators and GPU implementations of both kernels and complete protocols. Prior art spans a wide variety of ZKP schemes that vary significantly in computational overhead, proof size, verifier cost, protocol setup, and trust. The latest and widely used ZKP protocols are intentionally designed to balance these trade-offs. One particular challenge in modern ZKP systems is supporting complex, high-degree gates using the SumCheck protocol. We address this challenge with a novel programmable accelerator to efficiently handle arbitrary custom gates via SumCheck. Our accelerator achieves upwards of $1000\times$ geomean speedup over CPU-based SumChecks across a range of gate types. We include this unit in zkPHIRE, a programmable, full-system accelerator that accelerates the HyperPlonk protocol. zkPHIRE achieves $1486\times$ geomean speedup over CPU and $11.87\times$ geomean speedup over the state-of-the-art at iso-area. Together, these results demonstrate compelling performance while scaling to large problem sizes (upwards of $2^{30}$ constraints) and maintaining small proof sizes ($4-5$ KB).
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Hardware Architecture
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Corona: System Implications of Emerging Nanophotonic Technology
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A scalable multi-core architecture with heterogeneous memory structures for Dynamic Neuromorphic Asynchronous Processors (DYNAPs)
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
SpAtten: Efficient Sparse Attention Architecture with Cascade Token and Head Pruning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Neural Cache: Bit-Serial In-Cache Acceleration of Deep Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
SpArch: Efficient Architecture for Sparse Matrix Multiplication
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted