Addressing Personalized Bias for Unbiased Learning to Rank

August 28, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Zechun Niu, Lang Mei, Liu Yang, Ziyuan Zhao, Qiang Yan, Jiaxin Mao, Ji-Rong Wen arXiv ID 2508.20798 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Citations 1 Venue International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Unbiased learning to rank (ULTR), which aims to learn unbiased ranking models from biased user behavior logs, plays an important role in Web search. Previous research on ULTR has studied a variety of biases in users' clicks, such as position bias, presentation bias, and outlier bias. However, existing work often assumes that the behavior logs are collected from an ``average'' user, neglecting the differences between different users in their search and browsing behaviors. In this paper, we introduce personalized factors into the ULTR framework, which we term the user-aware ULTR problem. Through a formal causal analysis of this problem, we demonstrate that existing user-oblivious methods are biased when different users have different preferences over queries and personalized propensities of examining documents. To address such a personalized bias, we propose a novel user-aware inverse-propensity-score estimator for learning-to-rank objectives. Specifically, our approach models the distribution of user browsing behaviors for each query and aggregates user-weighted examination probabilities to determine propensities. We theoretically prove that the user-aware estimator is unbiased under some mild assumptions and shows lower variance compared to the straightforward way of calculating a user-dependent propensity for each impression. Finally, we empirically verify the effectiveness of our user-aware estimator by conducting extensive experiments on two semi-synthetic datasets and a real-world dataset.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted