Classification of Vision-Based Tactile Sensors: A Review

September 02, 2025 ยท The Cartographer ยท ๐Ÿ› IEEE Sensors Journal

๐Ÿ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper โ€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: Classification of Vision-Based Tactile Sensors: A Review"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Haoran Li, Yijiong Lin, Chenghua Lu, Max Yang, Efi Psomopoulou, Nathan F Lepora arXiv ID 2509.02478 Category cs.RO: Robotics Citations 8 Venue IEEE Sensors Journal Last Checked 3 days ago
Abstract
Vision-based tactile sensors (VBTS) have gained widespread application in robotic hands, grippers and prosthetics due to their high spatial resolution, low manufacturing costs, and ease of customization. While VBTSs have common design features, such as a camera module, they can differ in a rich diversity of sensing principles, material compositions, multimodal approaches, and data interpretation methods. Here, we propose a novel classification of VBTS that categorizes the technology into two primary sensing principles based on the underlying transduction of contact into a tactile image: the Marker-Based Transduction Principle and the Intensity-Based Transduction Principle. Marker-Based Transduction interprets tactile information by detecting marker displacement and changes in marker density. In contrast, Intensity-Based Transduction maps external disturbances with variations in pixel values. Depending on the design of the contact module, Marker-Based Transduction can be further divided into two subtypes: Simple Marker-Based (SMB) and Morphological Marker-Based (MMB) mechanisms. Similarly, the Intensity-Based Transduction Principle encompasses the Reflective Layer-based (RLB) and Transparent Layer-Based (TLB) mechanisms. This paper provides a comparative study of the hardware characteristics of these four types of sensors including various combination types, and discusses the commonly used methods for interpreting tactile information. This~comparison reveals some current challenges faced by VBTS technology and directions for future research.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Robotics