User Privacy and Large Language Models: An Analysis of Frontier Developers' Privacy Policies

September 05, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jennifer King, Kevin Klyman, Emily Capstick, Tiffany Saade, Victoria Hsieh arXiv ID 2509.05382 Category cs.CY: Computers & Society Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CR Citations 6 Venue Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Hundreds of millions of people now regularly interact with large language models via chatbots. Model developers are eager to acquire new sources of high-quality training data as they race to improve model capabilities and win market share. This paper analyzes the privacy policies of six U.S. frontier AI developers to understand how they use their users' chats to train models. Drawing primarily on the California Consumer Privacy Act, we develop a novel qualitative coding schema that we apply to each developer's relevant privacy policies to compare data collection and use practices across the six companies. We find that all six developers appear to employ their users' chat data to train and improve their models by default, and that some retain this data indefinitely. Developers may collect and train on personal information disclosed in chats, including sensitive information such as biometric and health data, as well as files uploaded by users. Four of the six companies we examined appear to include children's chat data for model training, as well as customer data from other products. On the whole, developers' privacy policies often lack essential information about their practices, highlighting the need for greater transparency and accountability. We address the implications of users' lack of consent for the use of their chat data for model training, data security issues arising from indefinite chat data retention, and training on children's chat data. We conclude by providing recommendations to policymakers and developers to address the data privacy challenges posed by LLM-powered chatbots.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computers & Society

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Green AI

Roy Schwartz, Jesse Dodge, ... (+2 more)

cs.CY πŸ› arXiv πŸ“š 1.5K cites 7 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted