Proximity Graphs for Similarity Search: Fast Construction, Lower Bounds, and Euclidean Separation

September 09, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Proc. ACM Manag. Data

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Shangqi Lu, Yufei Tao arXiv ID 2509.07732 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.DB Citations 0 Venue Proc. ACM Manag. Data Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Proximity graph-based methods have emerged as a leading paradigm for approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search in the system community. This paper presents fresh insights into the theoretical foundation of these methods. We describe an algorithm to build a proximity graph for $(1+Ξ΅)$-ANN search that has $O((1/Ξ΅)^Ξ»\cdot n \log Ξ”)$ edges and guarantees $(1/Ξ΅)^Ξ»\cdot \text{polylog }Ξ”$ query time. Here, $n$ and $Ξ”$ are the size and aspect ratio of the data input, respectively, and $Ξ»= O(1)$ is the doubling dimension of the underlying metric space. Our construction time is near-linear to $n$, improving the $Ξ©(n^2)$ bounds of all previous constructions. We complement our algorithm with lower bounds revealing an inherent limitation of proximity graphs: the number of edges needs to be at least $Ξ©((1/Ξ΅)^Ξ»\cdot n + n \log Ξ”)$ in the worst case, up to a subpolynomial factor. The hard inputs used in our lower-bound arguments are non-geometric, thus prompting the question of whether improvement is possible in the Euclidean space (a key subclass of metric spaces). We provide an affirmative answer by using geometry to reduce the graph size to $O((1/Ξ΅)^Ξ»\cdot n)$ while preserving nearly the same query and construction time.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted