Infinite Stream Estimation under Personalized $w$-Event Privacy
September 10, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Leilei Du, Peng Cheng, Lei Chen, Heng Tao Shen, Xuemin Lin, Wei Xi
arXiv ID
2509.08387
Category
cs.DB: Databases
Citations
1
Venue
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Streaming data collection is indispensable for stream data analysis, such as event monitoring. However, publishing these data directly leads to privacy leaks. $w$-event privacy is a valuable tool to protect individual privacy within a given time window while maintaining high accuracy in data collection. Most existing $w$-event privacy studies on infinite data stream only focus on homogeneous privacy requirements for all users. In this paper, we propose personalized $w$-event privacy protection that allows different users to have different privacy requirements in private data stream estimation. Specifically, we design a mechanism that allows users to maintain constant privacy requirements at each time slot, namely Personalized Window Size Mechanism (PWSM). Then, we propose two solutions to accurately estimate stream data statistics while achieving $w$-event level $Ξ΅$ personalized differential privacy ( ($w$, $Ξ΅$)-EPDP), namely Personalized Budget Distribution (PBD) and Peronalized Budget Absorption (PBA). PBD always provides at least the same privacy budget for the next time step as the amount consumed in the previous release. PBA fully absorbs the privacy budget from the previous $k$ time slots, while also borrowing from the privacy budget of the next $k$ time slots, to increase the privacy budget for the current time slot. We prove that both PBD and PBA outperform the state-of-the-art private stream estimation methods while satisfying the privacy requirements of all users. We demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of our PBD and PBA on both real and synthetic data sets, compared with the recent uniformity $w$-event approaches, Budget Distribution (BD) and Budget Absorption (BA). Our PBD achieves 68% less error than BD on average on real data sets. Besides, our PBA achieves 24.9% less error than BA on average on synthetic data sets.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Databases
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Untangling Blockchain: A Data Processing View of Blockchain Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Converting Static Image Datasets to Spiking Neuromorphic Datasets Using Saccades
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
BLOCKBENCH: A Framework for Analyzing Private Blockchains
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Data Synthesis based on Generative Adversarial Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
HoloClean: Holistic Data Repairs with Probabilistic Inference
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted