Enumeration kernels for Vertex Cover and Feedback Vertex Set

September 10, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Marin Bougeret, Guilherme C. M. Gomes, Vinicius F. dos Santos, Ignasi Sau arXiv ID 2509.08475 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Venue International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Enumerative kernelization is a recent and promising area sitting at the intersection of parameterized complexity and enumeration algorithms. Its study began with the paper of Creignou et al. [Theory Comput. Syst., 2017], and development in the area has started to accelerate with the work of Golovach et al. [J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 2022]. The latter introduced polynomial-delay enumeration kernels and applied them in the study of structural parameterizations of the \textsc{Matching Cut} problem and some variants. Few other results, mostly on \textsc{Longest Path} and some generalizations of \textsc{Matching Cut}, have also been developed. However, little success has been seen in enumeration versions of \textsc{Vertex Cover} and \textsc{Feedback Vertex Set}, some of the most studied problems in kernelization. In this paper, we address this shortcoming. Our first result is a polynomial-delay enumeration kernel with $2k$ vertices for \textsc{Enum Vertex Cover}, where we wish to list all solutions with at most $k$ vertices. This is obtained by developing a non-trivial lifting algorithm for the classical crown decomposition reduction rule, and directly improves upon the kernel with $\mathcal{O}(k^2)$ vertices derived from the work of Creignou et al. Our other result is a polynomial-delay enumeration kernel with $\mathcal{O}(k^3)$ vertices and edges for \textsc{Enum Feedback Vertex Set}; the proof is inspired by some ideas of ThomassΓ© [TALG, 2010], but with a weaker bound on the kernel size due to difficulties in applying the $q$-expansion technique.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted