Understanding Prompt Management in GitHub Repositories: A Call for Best Practices

September 15, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Software

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Hao Li, Hicham Masri, Filipe R. Cogo, Abdul Ali Bangash, Bram Adams, Ahmed E. Hassan arXiv ID 2509.12421 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 1 Venue IEEE Software Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The rapid adoption of foundation models (e.g., large language models) has given rise to promptware, i.e., software built using natural language prompts. Effective management of prompts, such as organization and quality assurance, is essential yet challenging. In this study, we perform an empirical analysis of 24,800 open-source prompts from 92 GitHub repositories to investigate prompt management practices and quality attributes. Our findings reveal critical challenges such as considerable inconsistencies in prompt formatting, substantial internal and external prompt duplication, and frequent readability and spelling issues. Based on these findings, we provide actionable recommendations for developers to enhance the usability and maintainability of open-source prompts within the rapidly evolving promptware ecosystem.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted