Kronecker Powers, Orthogonal Vectors, and the Asymptotic Spectrum
September 17, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Josh Alman, Baitian Li
arXiv ID
2509.14489
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.CC
Citations
0
Venue
IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
We study circuits for computing depth-2 linear transforms defined by Kronecker power matrices. Recent works have improved on decades-old constructions in this area using a new ''rebalancing'' approach [Alman, Guan and Padaki, SODA'23; Sergeev'22], but it was unclear how to apply this approach optimally. We find that Strassen's theory of asymptotic spectra can be applied to capture the design of these circuits. In particular, in hindsight, we find that the techniques of recent work on rebalancing were proving special cases of the duality theorem, which is central to Strassen's theory. We carefully outline a collection of ''obstructions'' to designing small depth-2 circuits using a rebalancing approach, and apply Strassen's theory to show that our obstructions are complete. Using this connection, combined with other algorithmic techniques, we give new improved circuit constructions as well as other applications, including: - The $N \times N$ disjointness matrix has a depth-2 linear circuit of size $O(N^{1.2495})$ over any field. This also yield smaller circuits for many families of matrices using reductions to disjointness. - The Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis implies an $N^{1 + Ξ©(1)}$ size lower bound for depth-2 linear circuits computing the Walsh--Hadamard transform (and the disjointness matrix with a technical caveat), and proving a $N^{1 + Ξ©(1)}$ depth-2 size lower bound would also imply breakthrough threshold circuit lower bounds. - The Orthogonal Vectors (OV) problem in moderate dimension $d$ can be solved in deterministic time $\tilde{O}(n \cdot 1.155^d)$, derandomizing an algorithm of Nederlof and WΔgrzycki [STOC'21], and the counting problem can be solved in time $\tilde{O}(n \cdot 1.26^d)$, improving an algorithm of Williams [FOCS'24] which runs in time $\tilde{O}(n \cdot 1.35^d)$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted