The Complexity of Finding and Counting Subtournaments

September 18, 2025 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Simon Dรถring, Sarah Houdaigoui, Lucas Picasarri-Arrieta, Philip Wellnitz arXiv ID 2509.14807 Category cs.CC: Computational Complexity Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We study the complexity of counting and finding small tournament patterns inside large tournaments. Given a fixed tournament $T$ of order $k$, we write ${\#}\text{IndSub}_{\text{To}}(\{T\})$ for the problem whose input is a tournament $G$ and the task is to compute the number of subtournaments of $G$ that are isomorphic to $T$. Previously, Yuster [Yus25] obtained that ${\#}\text{IndSub}_{\text{To}}(\{T\})$ is hard to compute for random tournaments $T$. We consider a new approach that uses linear combinations of subgraph-counts [CDM17] to obtain a finer analysis of the complexity of ${\#}\text{IndSub}_{\text{To}}(\{T\})$. We show that for all tournaments $T$ of order $k$ the problem ${\#}\text{IndSub}_{\text{To}}(\{T\})$ is always at least as hard as counting $\lfloor 3k/4 \rfloor$-cliques. This immediately yields tight bounds under ETH. Further, we consider the parameterized version of ${\#}\text{IndSub}_{\text{To}}(\mathcal{T})$ where we only consider patterns $T \in \mathcal{T}$ and that is parameterized by the pattern size $|V(T)|$. We show that ${\#}\text{IndSub}_{\text{To}}(\mathcal{T})$ is ${\#}W[1]$-hard as long as $\mathcal{T}$ contains infinitely many tournaments.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Computational Complexity