Toward Affordable and Non-Invasive Detection of Hypoglycemia: A Machine Learning Approach

September 22, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Lawrence Obiuwevwi, Krzysztof J. Rechowicz, Vikas Ashok, Sampath Jayarathna arXiv ID 2509.17842 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 1 Venue IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a growing global health issue, with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) requiring constant monitoring to avoid hypoglycemia. Although Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs) are effective, their cost and invasiveness limit access, particularly in low-resource settings. This paper proposes a non-invasive method to classify glycemic states using Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), a biosignal commonly captured by wearable sensors. We use the merged OhioT1DM 2018 and 2020 datasets to build a machine learning pipeline that detects hypoglycemia (glucose < 70 mg/dl) and normoglycemia (glucose > 70 mg/dl) with GSR alone. Seven models are trained and evaluated: Random Forest, XGBoost, MLP, CNN, LSTM, Logistic Regression, and K-Nearest Neighbors. Validation sets and 95% confidence intervals are reported to increase reliability and assess robustness. Results show that the LSTM model achieves a perfect hypoglycemia recall (1.00) with an F1-score confidence interval of [0.611-0.745], while XGBoost offers strong performance with a recall of 0.54 even under class imbalance. This approach highlights the potential for affordable, wearable-compatible glucose monitoring tools suitable for settings with limited CGM availability using GSR data. Index Terms: Hypoglycemia Detection, Galvanic Skin Response, Non Invasive Monitoring, Wearables, Machine Learning, Confidence Intervals.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted