AI-Driven Grading and Moderation for Collaborative Projects in Computer Science Education

October 05, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Songmei Yu, Andrew Zagula arXiv ID 2510.03998 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CY Citations 0 Venue Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Collaborative group projects are integral to computer science education, as they foster teamwork, problem-solving skills, and industry-relevant competencies. However, assessing individual contributions in group settings has long been challenging. Traditional assessment strategies, such as the equal distribution of grades or subjective peer assessments, often fall short in terms of fairness, objectivity, and scalability, particularly in large classrooms. This paper introduces a semi-automated, AI-assisted grading system that evaluates both project quality and individual effort using repository mining, communication analytics, and machine learning models. The system comprises modules for project evaluation, contribution analysis, and grade computation, and integrates seamlessly with platforms such as GitHub. A pilot deployment in a senior-level course demonstrated high alignment with instructor assessments, increased student satisfaction, and reduced instructor grading effort. We conclude by discussing implementation considerations, ethical implications, and proposed enhancements to broaden applicability.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted