Beyond the Benefits: A Systematic Review of the Harms and Consequences of Generative AI in Computing Education

October 06, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› European Conference on Modelling and Simulation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Seth Bernstein, Ashfin Rahman, Nadia Sharifi, Ariunjargal Terbish, Stephen MacNeil arXiv ID 2510.04443 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 2 Venue European Conference on Modelling and Simulation Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has already had a big impact on computing education with prior research identifying many benefits. However, recent studies have also identified potential risks and harms. To continue maximizing AI benefits while addressing the harms and unintended consequences, we conducted a systematic literature review of research focusing on the risks, harms, and unintended consequences of GenAI in computing education. Our search of ACM DL, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus (2022-2025) resulted in 1,677 papers, which were then filtered to 224 based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Guided by best practices for systematic reviews, four reviewers independently extracted publication year, learner population, research method, contribution type, GenAI technology, and educational task information from each paper. We then coded each paper for concrete harm categories such as academic integrity, cognitive effects, and trust issues. Our analysis shows patterns in how and where harms appear, highlights methodological gaps and opportunities for more rigorous evidence, and identifies under-explored harms and student populations. By synthesizing these insights, we intend to equip educators, computing students, researchers, and developers with a clear picture of the harms associated with GenAI in computing education.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted