An Empirical Study of Security-Policy Related Issues in Open Source Projects

October 07, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Rintaro Kanaji, Brittany Reid, Yutaro Kashiwa, Raula Gaikovina Kula, Hajimu Iida arXiv ID 2510.05604 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 0 Venue International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
GitHub recommends that projects adopt a security file that outlines vulnerability reporting procedures. However, the effectiveness and operational challenges of such files are not yet fully understood. This study aims to clarify the challenges that security files face in the vulnerability reporting process within open-source communities. Specifically, we classified and analyzed the content of 711 randomly sampled issues related to security files. We also conducted a quantitative comparative analysis of the close time and number of responses for issues concerning six community health files, including security files. Our analysis revealed that 79.5% of security file-related issues were requests to add the file, and reports that included links were closed, with a median time that was 2 days shorter. These findings offer practical insights for improving security reporting policies and community management, ultimately contributing to a more secure open-source ecosystem.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted