Lonely Individuals Show Distinct Patterns of Social Media Engagement
October 08, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yajing Wang, Talayeh Aledavood, Juhi Kulshrestha
arXiv ID
2510.06733
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Loneliness has reached epidemic proportions globally, posing serious risks to mental and physical health. As social media platforms increasingly mediate social interaction, understanding their relationship with loneliness has become urgent. While survey-based research has examined social media use and loneliness, findings remain mixed, and little is known about when and how often people engage with social media, or about whether different types of platforms are differently associated with loneliness. Web trace data now enable objective examination of these behavioral dimensions. We asked whether objectively measured patterns of social media engagement differ between lonely and non-lonely individuals across devices and platform types. Analyzing six months of web trace data combined with repeated surveys ($N=589$ mobile users; $N=851$ desktop users), we found that greater social media use was associated with higher loneliness across both devices, with this relationship specific to social media rather than other online activities. On desktop, lonely individuals exhibited shorter sessions but more frequent daily engagement. Lonely individuals spent more time on visual-sharing ($g = -0.47$), messaging ($g = -0.36$), and networking-oriented platforms on mobile. These findings demonstrate how longitudinal web trace data can reveal behavioral patterns associated with loneliness, and more broadly illustrate the potential of digital traces for studying other psychological states. Beyond research, the results inform the responsible design of digital interventions and platform features that better support psychological well-being across different technological contexts.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted