Sublinear Algorithms for Estimating Single-Linkage Clustering Costs
October 13, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Pan Peng, Christian Sohler, Yi Xu
arXiv ID
2510.11547
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Single-linkage clustering is a fundamental method for data analysis. Algorithmically, one can compute a single-linkage $k$-clustering (a partition into $k$ clusters) by computing a minimum spanning tree and dropping the $k-1$ most costly edges. This clustering minimizes the sum of spanning tree weights of the clusters. This motivates us to define the cost of a single-linkage $k$-clustering as the weight of the corresponding spanning forest, denoted by $\mathrm{cost}_k$. Besides, if we consider single-linkage clustering as computing a hierarchy of clusterings, the total cost of the hierarchy is defined as the sum of the individual clusterings, denoted by $\mathrm{cost}(G) = \sum_{k=1}^{n} \mathrm{cost}_k$. In this paper, we assume that the distances between data points are given as a graph $G$ with average degree $d$ and edge weights from $\{1,\dots, W\}$. Given query access to the adjacency list of $G$, we present a sampling-based algorithm that computes a succinct representation of estimates $\widehat{\mathrm{cost}}_k$ for all $k$. The running time is $\tilde O(d\sqrt{W}/\varepsilon^3)$, and the estimates satisfy $\sum_{k=1}^{n} |\widehat{\mathrm{cost}}_k - \mathrm{cost}_k| \le \varepsilon\cdot \mathrm{cost}(G)$, for any $0<\varepsilon <1$. Thus we can approximate the cost of every $k$-clustering upto $(1+\varepsilon)$ factor \emph{on average}. In particular, our result ensures that we can estimate $\cost(G)$ upto a factor of $1\pm \varepsilon$ in the same running time. We also extend our results to the setting where edges represent similarities. In this case, the clusterings are defined by a maximum spanning tree, and our algorithms run in $\tilde{O}(dW/\varepsilon^3)$ time. We futher prove nearly matching lower bounds for estimating the total clustering cost and we extend our algorithms to metric space settings.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted