Pattern Matching under Weighted Edit Distance

October 20, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Panagiotis Charalampopoulos, Tomasz Kociumaka, Philip Wellnitz arXiv ID 2510.17752 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Venue IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In Pattern Matching with Weighted Edits (PMWED), we are given a pattern $P$ of length $m$, a text $T$ of length $n$, a positive threshold $k$, and oracle access to a weight function that specifies the costs of edits (depending on the involved characters, and normalized so that the cost of each edit is at least $1$). The goal is to compute the starting positions of all fragments of $T$ that can be obtained from $P$ with edits of total cost at most $k$. PMWED captures typical real-world applications more accurately than its unweighted variant (PMED), where all edits have unit costs. We obtain three main results: (a) a conceptually simple $\tilde{O}(nk)$-time algorithm for PMWED, very different from that of Landau and Vishkin for PMED; (b) a significantly more complicated $\tilde{O}(n+k^{3.5} \cdot W^4\cdot n/m)$-time algorithm for PMWED under the assumption that the weight function is a metric with integer values between $0$ and $W$; and (c) an $\tilde{O}(n+k^4 \cdot n/m)$-time algorithm for PMWED for the case of arbitrary weights. In the setting of metrics with small integer values, we nearly match the state of the art for PMED where $W=1$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted