Minimum $s$--$t$ Cuts with Fewer Cut Queries

October 21, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Yonggang Jiang, Danupon Nanongkai, Pachara Sawettamalya arXiv ID 2510.18274 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We study the problem of computing a minimum $s$--$t$ cut in an unweighted, undirected graph via \emph{cut queries}. In this model, the input graph is accessed through an oracle that, given a subset of vertices $S \subseteq V$, returns the size of the cut $(S, V \setminus S)$. This line of work was initiated by Rubinstein, Schramm, and Weinberg (ITCS 2018), who gave a randomized algorithm that computes a minimum $s$--$t$ cut using $\widetilde{O}(n^{5/3})$ queries, thereby showing that one can avoid spending $\widetildeΘ(n^2)$ queries required to learn the entire graph. A recent result by Anand, Saranurak, and Wang (SODA 2025) also matched this upper bound via a deterministic algorithm based on blocking flows. In this work, we present a new randomized algorithm that improves the cut-query complexity to $\widetilde{O}(n^{8/5})$. At the heart of our approach is a query-efficient subroutine that incrementally reveals the graph edge-by-edge while increasing the maximum $s$--$t$ flow in the learned subgraph at a rate faster than classical augmenting-path methods. Notably, our algorithm is simple, purely combinatorial, and can be naturally interpreted as a recursive greedy procedure. As a further consequence, we obtain a \emph{deterministic} and \emph{combinatorial} two-party communication protocol for computing a minimum $s$--$t$ cut using $\widetilde{O}(n^{11/7})$ bits of communication. This improves upon the previous best bound of $\widetilde{O}(n^{5/3})$, which was obtained via reductions from the aforementioned cut-query algorithms. In parallel, it has been observed that an $\widetilde{O}(n^{3/2})$-bit randomized protocol can be achieved via continuous optimization techniques; however, these methods are fundamentally different from our combinatorial approach.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted