$L_p$ Sampling in Distributed Data Streams with Applications to Adversarial Robustness

October 26, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· + Add venue

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Honghao Lin, Zhao Song, David P. Woodruff, Shenghao Xie, Samson Zhou arXiv ID 2510.22816 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 1 Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In the distributed monitoring model, a data stream over a universe of size $n$ is distributed over $k$ servers, who must continuously provide certain statistics of the overall dataset, while minimizing communication with a central coordinator. In such settings, the ability to efficiently collect a random sample from the global stream is a powerful primitive, enabling a wide array of downstream tasks such as estimating frequency moments, detecting heavy hitters, or performing sparse recovery. Of particular interest is the task of producing a perfect $L_p$ sample, which given a frequency vector $f \in \mathbb{R}^n$, outputs an index $i$ with probability $\frac{f_i^p}{\|f\|_p^p}+\frac{1}{\mathrm{poly}(n)}$. In this paper, we resolve the problem of perfect $L_p$ sampling for all $p\ge 1$ in the distributed monitoring model. Specifically, our algorithm runs in $k^{p-1} \cdot \mathrm{polylog}(n)$ bits of communication, which is optimal up to polylogarithmic factors. Utilizing our perfect $L_p$ sampler, we achieve adversarially-robust distributed monitoring protocols for the $F_p$ moment estimation problem, where the goal is to provide a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation to $f_1^p+\ldots+f_n^p$. Our algorithm uses $\frac{k^{p-1}}{\varepsilon^2}\cdot\mathrm{polylog}(n)$ bits of communication for all $p\ge 2$ and achieves optimal bounds up to polylogarithmic factors, matching lower bounds by Woodruff and Zhang (STOC 2012) in the non-robust setting. Finally, we apply our framework to achieve near-optimal adversarially robust distributed protocols for central problems such as counting, frequency estimation, heavy-hitters, and distinct element estimation.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted