Leakage-abuse Attack Against Substring-SSE with Partially Known Dataset

November 02, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Conference on Information Security and Cryptology

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Xijie Ba, Qin Liu, Xiaohong Li, Jianting Ning arXiv ID 2511.00930 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Citations 0 Venue Conference on Information Security and Cryptology Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Substring-searchable symmetric encryption (substring-SSE) has become increasingly critical for privacy-preserving applications in cloud systems. However, existing schemes remain vulnerable to information leakage during search operations, particularly when adversaries possess partial knowledge of the target dataset. Although leakage-abuse attacks have been widely studied for traditional SSE, their applicability to substring-SSE under partially known data assumptions remains unexplored. In this paper, we present the first leakage-abuse attack on substring-SSE under partially-known dataset conditions. We develop a novel matrix-based correlation technique that extends and optimizes the LEAP framework for substring-SSE, enabling efficient recovery of plaintext data from encrypted suffix tree structures. Unlike existing approaches that rely on independent auxiliary datasets, our method directly exploits known data fragments to establish high-confidence mappings between ciphertext tokens and plaintext substrings through iterative matrix transformations. Comprehensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the attack, with recovery rates reaching 98.32% for substrings given 50% auxiliary knowledge. Even with only 10% prior knowledge, the attack achieves 74.42% substring recovery while maintaining strong scalability across datasets of varying sizes. The result reveals significant privacy risks in current substring-SSE designs and highlights the urgent need for leakage-resilient constructions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Cryptography & Security

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted