On Subexponential Parameterized Algorithms for Steiner Tree on Intersection Graphs of Geometric Objects

November 10, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sujoy Bhore, Baris Can Esmer, Daniel Marx, Karol Wegrzycki arXiv ID 2511.07346 Category cs.CG: Computational Geometry Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We study the Steiner Tree problem on the intersection graph of most natural families of geometric objects, e.g., disks, squares, polygons, etc. Given a set of $n$ objects in the plane and a subset $T$ of $t$ terminal objects, the task is to find a subset $S$ of $k$ objects such that the intersection graph of $S\cup T$ is connected. Given how typical parameterized problems behave on planar graphs and geometric intersection graphs, we would expect that exact algorithms with some form of subexponential dependence on the solution size or the number of terminals exist. Contrary to this expectation, we show that, assuming the Exponential-Time Hypothesis (ETH), there is no $2^{o(k+t)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$ time algorithm even for unit disks or unit squares, that is, there is no FPT algorithm subexponential in the size of the Steiner tree. However, subexponential dependence can appear in a different form: we show that Steiner Tree can be solved in time $n^{O(\sqrt{t})}$ for many natural classes of objects, including: Disks of arbitrary size. Axis-parallel squares of arbitrary size. Similarly-sized fat polygons. This in particular significantly improves and generalizes two recent results: (1) Steiner Tree on unit disks can be solved in time $n^{\Oh(\sqrt{k + t})}$ (Bhore, Carmi, Kolay, and Zehavi, Algorithmica 2023) and (2) Steiner Tree on planar graphs can be solved in time $n^{O(\sqrt{t})}$ (Marx, Pilipczuk, and Pilipczuk, FOCS 2018). We complement our algorithms with lower bounds that demonstrate that the class of objects cannot be significantly extended, even if we allow the running time to be $n^{o(k+t)/\log(k+t)}$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computational Geometry

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Dynamic Planar Convex Hull

Riko Jacob, Gerth StΓΈlting Brodal

cs.CG πŸ› The 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2002. Proceedings. πŸ“š 240 cites 7 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted