On Subexponential Parameterized Algorithms for Steiner Tree on Intersection Graphs of Geometric Objects
November 10, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Sujoy Bhore, Baris Can Esmer, Daniel Marx, Karol Wegrzycki
arXiv ID
2511.07346
Category
cs.CG: Computational Geometry
Cross-listed
cs.DS
Citations
0
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
We study the Steiner Tree problem on the intersection graph of most natural families of geometric objects, e.g., disks, squares, polygons, etc. Given a set of $n$ objects in the plane and a subset $T$ of $t$ terminal objects, the task is to find a subset $S$ of $k$ objects such that the intersection graph of $S\cup T$ is connected. Given how typical parameterized problems behave on planar graphs and geometric intersection graphs, we would expect that exact algorithms with some form of subexponential dependence on the solution size or the number of terminals exist. Contrary to this expectation, we show that, assuming the Exponential-Time Hypothesis (ETH), there is no $2^{o(k+t)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$ time algorithm even for unit disks or unit squares, that is, there is no FPT algorithm subexponential in the size of the Steiner tree. However, subexponential dependence can appear in a different form: we show that Steiner Tree can be solved in time $n^{O(\sqrt{t})}$ for many natural classes of objects, including: Disks of arbitrary size. Axis-parallel squares of arbitrary size. Similarly-sized fat polygons. This in particular significantly improves and generalizes two recent results: (1) Steiner Tree on unit disks can be solved in time $n^{\Oh(\sqrt{k + t})}$ (Bhore, Carmi, Kolay, and Zehavi, Algorithmica 2023) and (2) Steiner Tree on planar graphs can be solved in time $n^{O(\sqrt{t})}$ (Marx, Pilipczuk, and Pilipczuk, FOCS 2018). We complement our algorithms with lower bounds that demonstrate that the class of objects cannot be significantly extended, even if we allow the running time to be $n^{o(k+t)/\log(k+t)}$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Computational Geometry
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Dynamic Planar Convex Hull
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
TEMPO: Feature-Endowed TeichmΓΌller Extremal Mappings of Point Clouds
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Manufacturing Cost Estimation and Machining Feature Visualization
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Coresets for Clustering in Euclidean Spaces: Importance Sampling is Nearly Optimal
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Momen(e)t: Flavor the Moments in Learning to Classify Shapes
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted