The Longest Common Bitonic Subsequence: A Match-Sensitive Dynamic Programming Approach

November 12, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· + Add venue

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Md. Tanzeem Rahat, Md. Manzurul Hasan arXiv ID 2511.08958 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Given two sequences $A[1..n]$ and $B[1..m]$ over a totally ordered alphabet, the \emph{Longest Common Bitonic Subsequence} (LCBS) problem asks for a longest common subsequence that is strictly increasing up to a single peak element and strictly decreasing thereafter (allowing either phase to be empty). The only explicitly documented approach evaluates a quadratic dynamic program over the full $n\times m$ grid, which is prohibitive on large inputs. We present two exact algorithms. First, we give a simple $Θ(nm)$-time baseline that computes LCBS by combining a longest common increasing subsequence (LCIS) computation on $(A,B)$ with a second LCIS computation on the reversed inputs, and then maximizing $INC(i,j)+DEC(i,j)-1$ over all common peaks. The method is constructive via parent pointers. Second, we develop an \emph{instance-sensitive} algorithm whose running time depends on the number $\mathcal{M}$ of matching pairs $(i,j)$ with $A[i]=B[j]$. We view matches as vertices of a dominance-ordered poset and compute the increasing and decreasing halves by two 2D dominance DP passes supported by orthogonal range-maximum data structures, followed by a linear peak scan. With a standard 2D range tree (or equivalent), this yields $O(\mathcal{M}\log^{2}\mathcal{M} + \mathcal{M} + (n+m)\log(n+m))$ time and $O(\mathcal{M}\log \mathcal{M})$ space, and it improves over the dense baseline whenever $M\log^2 M\ll nm$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted