A number-theoretic conjecture implying faster algorithms for polynomial factorization and integer factorization

November 13, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Chris Umans, Siki Wang arXiv ID 2511.10851 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC, math.NT Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
The fastest known algorithm for factoring a degree $n$ univariate polynomial over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$ runs in time $O(n^{3/2 + o(1)}\text{polylog } q)$, and there is a reason to believe that the $3/2$ exponent represents a ''barrier'' inherent in algorithms that employ a so-called baby-steps-giant-steps strategy. In this paper, we propose a new strategy with the potential to overcome the $3/2$ barrier. In doing so we are led to a number-theoretic conjecture, one form of which is that there are sets $S, T$ of cardinality $n^Ξ²$, consisting of positive integers of magnitude at most $\exp(n^Ξ±)$, such that every integer $i \in [n]$ divides $s-t$ for some $s \in S, t \in T$. Achieving $Ξ±+ Ξ²\le 1 + o(1)$ is trivial; we show that achieving $Ξ±, Ξ²< 1/2$ (together with an assumption that $S, T$ are structured) implies an improvement to the exponent 3/2 for univariate polynomial factorization. Achieving $Ξ±= Ξ²= 1/3$ is best-possible and would imply an exponent 4/3 algorithm for univariate polynomial factorization. Interestingly, a second consequence would be a reduction of the current-best exponent for deterministic (exponential) algorithms for factoring integers, from $1/5$ to $1/6$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted