Finetuning LLMs for Automatic Form Interaction on Web-Browser in Selenium Testing Framework

November 19, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Nguyen-Khang Le, Hiep Nguyen, Ngoc-Minh Nguyen, Son T. Luu, Trung Vo, Quan Minh Bui, Shoshin Nomura, Le-Minh Nguyen arXiv ID 2511.15168 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 0 Venue International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Automated web application testing is a critical component of modern software development, with frameworks like Selenium widely adopted for validating functionality through browser automation. Among the essential aspects of such testing is the ability to interact with and validate web forms, a task that requires syntactically correct, executable scripts with high coverage of input fields. Despite its importance, this task remains underexplored in the context of large language models (LLMs), and no public benchmark or dataset exists to evaluate LLMs on form interaction generation systematically. This paper introduces a novel method for training LLMs to generate high-quality test cases in Selenium, specifically targeting form interaction testing. We curate both synthetic and human-annotated datasets for training and evaluation, covering diverse real-world forms and testing scenarios. We define clear metrics for syntax correctness, script executability, and input field coverage. Our empirical study demonstrates that our approach significantly outperforms strong baselines, including GPT-4o and other popular LLMs, across all evaluation metrics. Our work lays the groundwork for future research on LLM-based web testing and provides resources to support ongoing progress in this area.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted