Exploring Experiential Differences Between Virtual and Physical Memory-Linked Objects in Extended Reality

March 22, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท ๐Ÿ› ACM CHI 2026 Extended Abstracts

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Zaid Ahmed, Omar A. Khan, Hyeongil Nam, Kangsoo Kim arXiv ID 2603.21381 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 0 Venue ACM CHI 2026 Extended Abstracts
Abstract
Extended Reality (XR) enables immersive capture and re-experience of personal memories, yet how interface representations shape these experiences remains underexplored. We examine how users relive and share XR memories through three interaction approaches: (1) physical memory-linked objects, (2) virtual memory-linked objects, and (3) a conventional virtual gallery interface. In a within-subjects study (N=24, 12 pairs), participants captured shared experiences using 360ยฐ video and later accessed and shared these memories across the three interfaces. We analyzed open-ended qualitative responses focusing on perceived value, enjoyment, usability, emotional attachment, and social connection. The findings reveal trade-offs: physical objects fostered stronger social connection and conversation through tangible exchange; virtual objects balanced engagement and usability; and the gallery interface was efficient but less personal. These results suggest that object-based representations, physical and virtual, support key social dimensions of XR memory experiences, offering lessons for designing future systems that emphasize shared meaning and interpersonal connection.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Human-Computer Interaction