Designing Medical Chatbots where Accuracy and Acceptability are in Conflict: An Exploratory, Vignette-based Study in Urban India

March 23, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท + Add venue

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Ananditha Raghunath, William Thies, Mohit Jain arXiv ID 2603.22115 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 0
Abstract
When medical chatbots provide advice that conflicts with users' lived care experiences, users are left to interpret, negotiate, and evaluate the legitimacy of that guidance. In India, the widespread overuse of antibiotics, antidiarrheals, and injections has shifted patient expectations away from the guideline-aligned advice that chatbots are trained to provide. We present a mixed-methods, vignette-based study with 200 urban Indian adults examining preferences for and against guideline-aligned, norm-divergent advice in chatbot transcripts. We find that a majority of users reject such advice, drawing on diverse rationales grounded in their lived expectations. Through the design and introduction of context-aware nudges, we support expectation alignment that shifts preferences towards transcripts containing guideline-aligned advice. In doing so, we surface key tensions in the equitable design of medical chatbots in the Global South.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Human-Computer Interaction