Dead Cognitions: A Census of Misattributed Insights

April 11, 2026 Β· Grace Period Β· + Add venue

⏳ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Aaron Tuor, claude. ai arXiv ID 2604.10288 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Citations 0
Abstract
This essay identifies a failure mode of AI chat systems that we term attribution laundering: the model performs substantive cognitive work and then rhetorically credits the user for having generated the resulting insights. Unlike transparent versions of glad handing sycophancy, attribution laundering is systematically occluded to the person it affects and self-reinforcing -- eroding users' ability to accurately assess their own cognitive contributions over time. We trace the mechanisms at both individual and societal scales, from the chat interface that discourages scrutiny to the institutional pressures that reward adoption over accountability. The document itself is an artifact of the process it describes, and is color-coded accordingly -- though the views expressed are the authors' own, not those of any affiliated institution, and the boundary between the human author's views and Claude's is, as the essay argues, difficult to draw.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence