enclawed: A Configurable, Sector-Neutral Hardening Framework for Single-User AI Assistant Gateways

April 18, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท + Add venue

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Alfredo Metere arXiv ID 2604.16838 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.MA Citations 0
Abstract
We present enclawed, a hard-fork hardening framework built on top of the OpenClaw single-user personal artificial intelligence (AI) assistant gateway. enclawed targets deployments that need attestable peer trust, deny-by-default external connectivity, signed-module loading, and a tamper-evident audit trail typically regulated industries such as financial services, healthcare, defense contracting, regulated R&D, and government enclaves. The framework ships in two flavors: an open flavor that preserves OpenClaw compatibility while still emitting audit, classification, and data-loss-prevention (DLP) signals, and an enclaved flavor that activates strict allowlists, Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) cryptographic-module assertion, mandatory module-manifest signature verification, and high-assurance peer attestation for the Model Context Protocol (MCP). The classification ladder is fully data-driven: a deploying organization selects from five built-in presets (generic, US-government, healthcare, financial services, three-tier) or supplies its own JSON. We accompany the implementation with a security review, a 204-case test suite (146 unit tests, 58 adversarial pen-tests for tamper detection, signature forgery, egress bypass, trust-root mutation, DLP evasion, prompt injection, and code injection), real-time human-in-the-loop control (per-agent pause / resume / stop and approval queues), a memory-bounded secure transaction buffer with rollback (default cap 50% of system RAM, configurable), a strict-mode TypeScript typecheck of all 22 framework files, and a GitHub Actions workflow ready for continuous integration. enclawed is a hardening framework, not an accredited compliance certification. The deploying organization remains responsible for hardware, validated cryptographic modules, certified facilities, and assessor sign-off.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Cryptography & Security