Consistency Training Along the Transformer Stack

June 04, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท ๐Ÿ› EMNLP 2026

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Sukrati Gautam, Neil Shah, Arav Dhoot, Bryan Maruyama, Caroline Wei, Rohan Kapoor, Robert Sidey, Prakhar Gupta, Zi Cheng Huang, David Demitri Africa arXiv ID 2606.05817 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 0 Venue EMNLP 2026
Abstract
Consistency training encourages models to behave similarly across different contexts, and has shown promise for reducing misalignment. We broaden the scope of consistency training in two ways. First, we introduce two new internal consistency targets: MLP Consistency Training (MLPCT), which matches post-activation MLP states, and Attention Consistency Training (AttCT), which matches per-head attention distributions. Second, we apply consistency training to four additional safety threats: persona in-context learning attacks, adversarial frustration, prefill attacks, and conditional misalignment. Across several models and threat settings, we find that consistency training reduces misalignment well beyond the sycophancy and jailbreak settings studied in prior work. We also find cases of cross-threat generalization, where training against one failure mode improves robustness to another, and identify a shared residual-stream mechanism underlying ACT, MLPCT, and AttCT, while distinguishing BCT as mechanistically distinct. Our results suggest that consistency training is a flexible and extensible framework for alignment, capable of unifying defenses against a broader class of model pathologies.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning