What Do Deepfake Speech Detectors Actually Hear?

June 09, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท ๐Ÿ› Interspeech 2026

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Vojtฤ›ch Stanฤ›k, Veronika Jirmusovรก, Anton Firc, Kamil Malinka, Jakub Reลก, Martin Pereลกรญni arXiv ID 2606.10912 Category cs.SD: Sound Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.CR, cs.LG Citations 0 Venue Interspeech 2026
Abstract
Deepfake speech detectors often output a single score without explaining why an audio sample is flagged, where in the signal the evidence lies, or what cues drive the decision. We propose an audio-native explainability pipeline using Integrated Gradients on time-aligned self-supervised representations to localize decision evidence over time. We apply the proposed method to three WavLM-based detectors (AASIST, CA-MHFA, SLS) on ASVspoof 5 and manually annotate the highest-attribution regions to provide a semantic meaning of the most important cues. Despite similar performance, the detectors rely on different cues: AASIST emphasizes non-speech/environment cues, CA-MHFA focuses on localized phoneme artifacts, and SLS relies on word boundaries and spectral integrity. We move beyond speculative reasoning and validate our findings by causal masking of the primary detector cues. Observed performance degradation further supports the explained detector semantics.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Sound