๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
What Do Deepfake Speech Detectors Actually Hear?
June 09, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท ๐ Interspeech 2026
Authors
Vojtฤch Stanฤk, Veronika Jirmusovรก, Anton Firc, Kamil Malinka, Jakub Reลก, Martin Pereลกรญni
arXiv ID
2606.10912
Category
cs.SD: Sound
Cross-listed
cs.AI,
cs.CR,
cs.LG
Citations
0
Venue
Interspeech 2026
Abstract
Deepfake speech detectors often output a single score without explaining why an audio sample is flagged, where in the signal the evidence lies, or what cues drive the decision. We propose an audio-native explainability pipeline using Integrated Gradients on time-aligned self-supervised representations to localize decision evidence over time. We apply the proposed method to three WavLM-based detectors (AASIST, CA-MHFA, SLS) on ASVspoof 5 and manually annotate the highest-attribution regions to provide a semantic meaning of the most important cues. Despite similar performance, the detectors rely on different cues: AASIST emphasizes non-speech/environment cues, CA-MHFA focuses on localized phoneme artifacts, and SLS relies on word boundaries and spectral integrity. We move beyond speculative reasoning and validate our findings by causal masking of the primary detector cues. Observed performance degradation further supports the explained detector semantics.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Sound
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Multi-talker Speech Separation with Utterance-level Permutation Invariant Training of Deep Recurrent Neural Networks
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
The fifth 'CHiME' Speech Separation and Recognition Challenge: Dataset, task and baselines
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
TasNet: time-domain audio separation network for real-time, single-channel speech separation
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
SampleRNN: An Unconditional End-to-End Neural Audio Generation Model
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted