Patient-Aware Contrastive Learning Preserves Per-Patient Structure in RR-Interval Representations

June 22, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท + Add venue

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Yasantha Niroshana, Weijith Wimalasiri, Chathuranga Hettiarachchi arXiv ID 2606.23570 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Citations 0
Abstract
Contrastive representation learning struggles on physiological signals when each subject contributes a distinct baseline pattern. If class differences overlap with subject differences,class-level objectives such as supervised contrastive learning tend to merge per-subject structure into a single per-class cluster,removing the individual variation that a model needs to generalize to unseen patients. We study this problem in the setting of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation(PAF) detection from RR-interval(RRI) sequences and propose a patient-aware contrastive objective that forms positive pairs only from same-patient, same-class segments, preserving each patient's own sinus rhythm(SR) baseline while still pushing the two classes apart. Examining the learned embeddings directly, our objective achieves the most consistent per-patient SR structure (cohesion $0.850$ vs. $0.800$ for supervised contrastive loss (SupCon) and $0.772$ for binary cross-entropy (BCE)). We also identify that BCE produces the cleanest global class separation yet the most disordered per-patient structure. This is precisely why a linear probe trained on its features breaks down on unseen patients. On the IRIDIA-AF dataset, the resulting representation reaches a patient-independent Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) of $0.989 \pm 0.003$ with $2.6\times$ lower seed variance than supervised contrastive baselines.These results highlight that per-subject geometric consistency, rather than global class separability, is key to robust cross-patient generalization.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning