How do Execution Features Improve Statistical Fault Localization? An Empirical Study

June 29, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท + Add venue

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Marius Smytzek, Andreas Zeller arXiv ID 2606.30324 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 0
Abstract
Automated fault localization helps developers find faults in large code bases. Statistical fault localization (SFL) ranks suspicious lines from pass/fail spectra, but line execution alone misses information like data-flow, values, or branch conditions that explain why a failure occurs. This study evaluates whether augmenting SFL with execution features improves localization accuracy and developer-oriented inspection effort. We extract execution features with EFDD for all Tests4Py subjects, train per-subject random forests, map importances to source lines, and combine the resulting weights with established SFL formulas. The evaluation measures reference-patch accuracy, line- and function-level effort, robustness, and feasibility using a confounder-adjusted mixed-effects model, corroborated by paired statistical tests and outcome-neutral quality checks.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Software Engineering