CAN We Trust Your Results? A Cross-Dataset Study of Automotive IDS Evaluation

June 29, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท + Add venue

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Beatrix Koltai, Gergely Acs, Andras Gazdag arXiv ID 2606.30430 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 0
Abstract
The increasing connectivity of modern vehicles has made securing in-vehicle communication networks a critical challenge. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) have been widely studied as a defense mechanism for detecting malicious activities on the Controller Area Network (CAN) bus. However, the evaluation of CAN IDS methods remains difficult due to inconsistencies in experimental setups and the lack of standardized benchmarking frameworks. As a result, reported performance often depends on dataset-specific characteristics and may not reflect how detection methods behave in different environments. This work introduces a benchmarking framework for consistent evaluation of CAN IDSs across multiple datasets. Using the proposed framework, we integrate seven publicly available CAN IDS datasets collected under different experimental conditions and perform cross-dataset evaluation of five conceptually different IDS approaches. Our results highlight how detection performance can vary significantly across datasets, demonstrating the importance of cross-dataset benchmarking for assessing the robustness and generalization capabilities of CAN IDS methods.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Cryptography & Security