Exploring Differences Between Tabular Enterprise Data and Public Benchmarks

June 29, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท + Add venue

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Myung Jun Kim, Maximilian Schambach, Frank Essenberger, Andre Sres, Johannes Hรถhne arXiv ID 2606.30452 Category cs.LG: Machine Learning Citations 0
Abstract
Tabular data dominate the landscape of data science, increasingly attracting innovative machine learning models and tailored benchmarks. Yet, little is known for enterprise data, where tables constitute the backbone of business operations. To broaden the benchmarking landscape for business applications, this work aims to actualize the characteristics of enterprise data by providing an analysis of data statistics and performance measurements of tabular models such as TabPFN, TabICL and ConTextTab. Through our analysis, we find enterprise data markedly differ from tabular benchmarks and we demonstrate that a tabular model that performs well on typical tabular benchmarks may perform poorly on real world enterprise data -- and vice versa. This lack of generalization underlines the need for additional benchmarks with enterprise-grade characteristics.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Machine Learning