One Future, Every Robot: Label-Efficient Collective-State Prediction with Decentralized JEPA

July 30, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท ๐Ÿ› ICRA 2027

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Alan-Barsag Gazzaev, Alexey Gavrilov, Sergey Muravyov arXiv ID 2607.28443 Category cs.RO: Robotics Citations 0 Venue ICRA 2027
Abstract
Can every robot in a swarm predict the same future collective state from only local observations and bandwidth-limited messages? We formulate this as decentralized shared-state prediction and introduce Collective-State JEPA (CS-JEPA), a recurrent joint-embedding predictive architecture whose output at every robot represents one common future token field. At deployment, each robot uses a 16-frame local history and one 64-float recurrent message per directed edge; there is no global pooling, target encoder, episode clock, or recorded future action. After pretraining without downstream collective labels, frozen representations are evaluated with ridge probes fitted on 6, 12, or 24 globally labeled episodes. Against raw-future reconstruction with the same receiver anchor and deployment capacity but 9,607 additional training-only parameters, a prospectively registered five-seed follow-up improves prediction-error and inter-robot-agreement label-budget AUC on in-distribution, ring, mutual-kNN, and unseen-size families up to 108 robots. Every effect favors CS-JEPA in 5/5 outer seeds. A sealed eight-seed action-conditioned follow-up reduces branch-value MSE by 45.5% and improves within-context candidate-score correlation by 0.1291. In a separate 16-seed fully decentralized closed-loop study, receiver-local CS-JEPA planning improves utility over nominal control ($ฮ”= +0.01053$, $p = 0.00070$) and first plan-coefficient agreement over matched reconstruction ($ฮ”= +0.14472$, $p = 0.000061$). These results support common-future JEPA targets as a label-efficient primitive for decentralized swarm prediction under topology and size shift, with additional evidence of planning-relevant value estimation and closed-loop decision consistency.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Robotics