A Unified DINOv2-Based Framework for LVEF Estimation, GLS Dysfunction Classification, and Early Cardiotoxicity Prediction

August 14, 2026 Β· Grace Period Β· πŸ› MICCAI 2026

⏳ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Xiaotong Zhang, Mingyue Cui, Qing Cao, Jingming Xia arXiv ID 2608.14750 Category eess.IV: Image & Video Processing Cross-listed cs.CV Citations 0 Venue MICCAI 2026
Abstract
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation (Task 1), global longitu-dinal strain (GLS)-based dysfunction classification (Task 2), and early cardi-otoxicity prediction (Task 3) provide complementary information for cardio-oncology assessment. LVEF reflects macroscopic ventricular volume chang-es as the clinical standard, whereas GLS captures subtle myocardial defor-mation, indicating subclinical cardiotoxicity before overt LVEF decline. Fur-thermore, predicting cardiotoxicity from baseline echocardiography prior to treatment enables preventive interventions at an early stage. To address these three tasks, we employ a DINOv2-based framework with task-specific adap-tation and prediction heads. Built upon a frozen foundation encoder, the framework incorporates parameter-efficient Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and temporal aggregation to learn task-specialized representations, ensuring robust generalization. Crucially, during inference, it operates in a fully cycle-detection-free and phase-free manner, requiring neither cardiac cycle seg-mentation nor explicit End-Diastolic/End-Systolic (ED/ES) annotations. Ad-ditionally, we introduce an ED/ES-guided 2D/3D hybrid multi-view regres-sion model specifically to optimize Task 1. On a patient-level split containing 1,203 training videos from 237 patients and 300 validation videos from 59 independent patients, the DINOv2-based framework achieved a mean abso-lute error (MAE) of 5.03% for Task 1, an AUC-ROC of 76.48% for Task 2, and an AUC-ROC of 70.26% for Task 3. For Task 1, the specialized ED/ES-guided model further improves performance, achieving an MAE of 4.64%. This framework demonstrates the effectiveness of foundation model repre-sentations across diverse cardio-oncology tasks and the additional benefit of physiology-guided modeling for accurate LVEF estimation.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Image & Video Processing