What Makes an Initial Reaction Ready for Discussion?: Multi-Persona AI Support for Stance Reflection and Writing

August 24, 2026 ยท Grace Period ยท ๐Ÿ› TAICHI 2026

โณ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Sky Shih-Kai Hong, Mu-Tien Kuo, Wei-Ji Chen arXiv ID 2608.23050 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 0 Venue TAICHI 2026
Abstract
An initial reaction to a social or community issue can feel meaningful before it is ready to become a message: people still need to clarify the claim, anticipate audience risks, and decide how much reasoning should become visible to others. We present StanceLab, a prototype for preparing a stance before entering a discussion. The prototype compares a three-persona mode, where an Interviewer, Mentor, and Opponent respond in parallel to help users diagnose and revise a stance, with a standalone LLM mode. In a formative within-subject pilot with six participants and 12 task sessions, every session produced a short final message in the notepad. The pilot revealed two design requirements: persona roles should diagnose useful blind spots or objections, and parallel responses need coordination support. We propose a future diagnosis-and-writing workflow that turns persona-based reflection into selective, audience-aware final messages.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Human-Computer Interaction