Asymptotic Compatibility between LOCC Conversion and Recovery
April 12, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Kosuke Ito, Wataru Kumagai, Masahito Hayashi
arXiv ID
1504.02967
Category
quant-ph: Quantum Computing
Cross-listed
cs.IT
Citations
1
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Recently, entanglement concentration was explicitly shown to be irreversible. However, it is still not clear what kind of states can be reversibly converted in the asymptotic setting by LOCC when neither the initial nor the target state is maximally entangled. We derive the necessary and sufficient condition for the reversibility of LOCC conversions between two bipartite pure entangled states in the asymptotic setting. In addition, we show that conversion can be achieved perfectly with only local unitary operation under such condition except for special cases. Interestingly, our result implies that an error-free reversible conversion is asymptotically possible even between states whose copies can never be locally unitarily equivalent with any finite numbers of copies, although such a conversion is impossible in the finite setting. In fact, we show such an example. Moreover, we establish how to overcome the irreversibility of LOCC conversion in two ways. As for the first method, we evaluate how many copies of the initial state is to be lost to overcome the irreversibility of LOCC conversion. The second method is to add a supplementary state appropriately, which also works for LU conversion unlike the first method. Especially, for the qubit system, any non-maximally pure entangled state can be a universal resource for the asymptotic reversibility when copies of the state is sufficiently many. More interestingly, our analysis implies that far-from-maximally entangled states can be better than nearly maximally entangled states as this type of resource. This fact brings new insight to the resource theory of state conversion.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Quantum Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Quantum machine learning: a classical perspective
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Noise-Adaptive Compiler Mappings for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computers
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ProjectQ: An Open Source Software Framework for Quantum Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Quantum Recommendation Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealer
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted