Efficient quantum tomography

August 08, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· + Add venue

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ryan O'Donnell, John Wright arXiv ID 1508.01907 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 0 Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
In the quantum state tomography problem, one wishes to estimate an unknown $d$-dimensional mixed quantum state $ρ$, given few copies. We show that $O(d/Ρ)$ copies suffice to obtain an estimate $\hatρ$ that satisfies $\|\hatρ - ρ\|_F^2 \leq Ρ$ (with high probability). An immediate consequence is that $O(\mathrm{rank}(ρ) \cdot d/Ρ^2) \leq O(d^2/Ρ^2)$ copies suffice to obtain an $Ρ$-accurate estimate in the standard trace distance. This improves on the best known prior result of $O(d^3/Ρ^2)$ copies for full tomography, and even on the best known prior result of $O(d^2\log(d/Ρ)/Ρ^2)$ copies for spectrum estimation. Our result is the first to show that nontrivial tomography can be obtained using a number of copies that is just linear in the dimension. Next, we generalize these results to show that one can perform efficient principal component analysis on $ρ$. Our main result is that $O(k d/Ρ^2)$ copies suffice to output a rank-$k$ approximation $\hatρ$ whose trace distance error is at most $Ρ$ more than that of the best rank-$k$ approximator to $ρ$. This subsumes our above trace distance tomography result and generalizes it to the case when $ρ$ is not guaranteed to be of low rank. A key part of the proof is the analogous generalization of our spectrum-learning results: we show that the largest $k$ eigenvalues of $ρ$ can be estimated to trace-distance error $Ρ$ using $O(k^2/Ρ^2)$ copies. In turn, this result relies on a new coupling theorem concerning the Robinson-Schensted-Knuth algorithm that should be of independent combinatorial interest.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted