Quantum adiabatic optimization without heuristics
October 10, 2018 · Declared Dead · 🏛 arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Michael Jarret, Brad Lackey, Aike Liu, Kianna Wan
arXiv ID
1810.04686
Category
quant-ph: Quantum Computing
Cross-listed
cs.DS
Citations
14
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Quantum adiabatic optimization (QAO) is performed using a time-dependent Hamiltonian $H(s)$ with spectral gap $γ(s)$. Assuming the existence of an oracle $Γ$ such that $γ_\min = Θ\left(\min_sΓ(s)\right)$, we provide an algorithm that reliably performs QAO in time $O\left(γ_\min^{-1}\right)$ with $O\left(\log(γ_\min^{-1})\right)$ oracle queries, where $γ_\min = \min_s γ(s)$. Our strategy is not heuristic and does not require guessing time parameters or annealing paths. Rather, our algorithm naturally produces an annealing path such that $\|dH/ds\| \approx γ(s)$ and chooses its own runtime to be as close as possible to optimal while promising convergence to the ground state. We then demonstrate the feasibility of this approach in practice by explicitly constructing a gap oracle $Γ$ for the problem of finding the minimum point $m = \mathrm{argmin}_u W(u)$ of the cost function $W:\mathcal{V}\longrightarrow [0,1]$, restricting ourselves to computational basis measurements and driving Hamiltonian $H(0)=I - |\mathcal{V}|^{-1}\sum_{u,v \in \mathcal{V}}\vert{u}\rangle\langle{v}\vert$. Requiring only that $W$ have a constant lower bound on its spectral gap and upper bound $κ$ on its spectral ratio, our QAO algorithm returns $m$ with probability $(1-ε)(1-e^{-1/ε})$ in time $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(ε^{-1}[\sqrt{|\mathcal{V}|} + (κ-1)^{2/3}|\mathcal{V}|^{2/3}])$. This achieves a quantum advantage for all $κ$, and recovers Grover scaling up to logarithmic factors when $κ\approx 1$. We implement the algorithm as a subroutine in an optimization procedure that produces $m$ with exponentially small failure probability and expected runtime $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(ε^{-1}[\sqrt{|\mathcal{V}|} + (κ-1)^{2/3}|\mathcal{V}|^{2/3}])$ even when $κ$ is not known beforehand.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
📜 Similar Papers
In the same crypt — Quantum Computing
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Quantum machine learning: a classical perspective
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Noise-Adaptive Compiler Mappings for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computers
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
ProjectQ: An Open Source Software Framework for Quantum Computing
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Quantum Recommendation Systems
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealer
Died the same way — 👻 Ghosted
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
👻
Ghosted