Quantum algorithm for estimating volumes of convex bodies

August 11, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Andrew M. Childs, Shih-Han Hung, Tongyang Li, Chunhao Wang, Xiaodi Wu arXiv ID 1908.03903 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.DS, math.OC Citations 23 Venue ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Estimating the volume of a convex body is a central problem in convex geometry and can be viewed as a continuous version of counting. We present a quantum algorithm that estimates the volume of an $n$-dimensional convex body within multiplicative error $Ξ΅$ using $\tilde{O}(n^{3}+n^{2.5}/Ξ΅)$ queries to a membership oracle and $\tilde{O}(n^{5}+n^{4.5}/Ξ΅)$ additional arithmetic operations. For comparison, the best known classical algorithm uses $\tilde{O}(n^{4}+n^{3}/Ξ΅^{2})$ queries and $\tilde{O}(n^{6}+n^{5}/Ξ΅^{2})$ additional arithmetic operations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first quantum speedup for volume estimation. Our algorithm is based on a refined framework for speeding up simulated annealing algorithms that might be of independent interest. This framework applies in the setting of "Chebyshev cooling", where the solution is expressed as a telescoping product of ratios, each having bounded variance. We develop several novel techniques when implementing our framework, including a theory of continuous-space quantum walks with rigorous bounds on discretization error. To complement our quantum algorithms, we also prove that volume estimation requires $Ξ©(\sqrt n+1/Ξ΅)$ quantum membership queries, which rules out the possibility of exponential quantum speedup in $n$ and shows optimality of our algorithm in $1/Ξ΅$ up to poly-logarithmic factors.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted