Quantum algorithms for Second-Order Cone Programming and Support Vector Machines

August 19, 2019 · Declared Dead · 🏛 Quantum

👻 CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Iordanis Kerenidis, Anupam Prakash, Dániel Szilágyi arXiv ID 1908.06720 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.DS, stat.ML Citations 46 Venue Quantum Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
We present a quantum interior-point method (IPM) for second-order cone programming (SOCP) that runs in time $\widetilde{O} \left( n\sqrt{r} \frac{ζκ}{δ^2} \log \left(1/ε\right) \right)$ where $r$ is the rank and $n$ the dimension of the SOCP, $δ$ bounds the distance of intermediate solutions from the cone boundary, $ζ$ is a parameter upper bounded by $\sqrt{n}$, and $κ$ is an upper bound on the condition number of matrices arising in the classical IPM for SOCP. The algorithm takes as its input a suitable quantum description of an arbitrary SOCP and outputs a classical description of a $δ$-approximate $ε$-optimal solution of the given problem. Furthermore, we perform numerical simulations to determine the values of the aforementioned parameters when solving the SOCP up to a fixed precision $ε$. We present experimental evidence that in this case our quantum algorithm exhibits a polynomial speedup over the best classical algorithms for solving general SOCPs that run in time $O(n^{ω+0.5})$ (here, $ω$ is the matrix multiplication exponent, with a value of roughly $2.37$ in theory, and up to $3$ in practice). For the case of random SVM (support vector machine) instances of size $O(n)$, the quantum algorithm scales as $O(n^k)$, where the exponent $k$ is estimated to be $2.59$ using a least-squares power law. On the same family random instances, the estimated scaling exponent for an external SOCP solver is $3.31$ while that for a state-of-the-art SVM solver is $3.11$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

📜 Similar Papers

In the same crypt — Quantum Computing

R.I.P. 👻 Ghosted

Variational Quantum Algorithms

M. Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, ... (+9 more)

quant-ph 🏛 Nature Reviews Physics 📚 3.3K cites 5 years ago

Died the same way — 👻 Ghosted