Spectral sparsification of matrix inputs as a preprocessing step for quantum algorithms

October 07, 2019 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Steven Herbert, Sathyawageeswar Subramanian arXiv ID 1910.02861 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We study the potential utility of classical techniques of spectral sparsification of graphs as a preprocessing step for digital quantum algorithms, in particular, for Hamiltonian simulation. Our results indicate that spectral sparsification of a graph with $n$ nodes through a sampling method, e.g.\ as in \cite{Spielman2011resistances} using effective resistances, gives, with high probability, a locally computable matrix $\tilde H$ with row sparsity at most $\mathcal{O}(\text{poly}\log n)$. For a symmetric matrix $H$ of size $n$ with $m$ non-zero entries, a one-time classical runtime overhead of $\mathcal{O}(m||H||t\log n/Ξ΅)$ expended in spectral sparsification is then found to be useful as a way to obtain a sparse matrix $\tilde H$ that can be used to approximate time evolution $e^{itH}$ under the Hamiltonian $H$ to precision $Ξ΅$. Once such a sparsifier is obtained, it could be used with a variety of quantum algorithms in the query model that make crucial use of row sparsity. We focus on the case of efficient quantum algorithms for sparse Hamiltonian simulation, since Hamiltonian simulation underlies, as a key subroutine, several quantum algorithms, including quantum phase estimation and recent ones for linear algebra. Finally, we also give two simple quantum algorithms to estimate the row sparsity of an input matrix, which achieve a query complexity of $\mathcal{O}(n^{3/2})$ as opposed to $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ that would be required by any classical algorithm for the task.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted