Effective gaps are not effective: quasipolynomial classical simulation of obstructed stoquastic Hamiltonians

April 18, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Physical Review Letters

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jacob Bringewatt, Michael Jarret arXiv ID 2004.08681 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cond-mat.str-el, cs.DS Citations 8 Venue Physical Review Letters Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
All known examples confirming the possibility of an exponential separation between classical simulation algorithms and stoquastic adiabatic quantum computing (AQC) exploit symmetries that constrain adiabatic dynamics to effective, symmetric subspaces. The symmetries produce large effective eigenvalue gaps, which in turn make adiabatic computation efficient. We present a classical algorithm to efficiently sample from the effective subspace of a $k$-local stoquastic Hamiltonian $H$, without a priori knowledge of its symmetries (or near-symmetries). Our algorithm maps any $k$-local Hamiltonian to a graph $G=(V,E)$ with $\lvert V \rvert = O\left(\mathrm{poly}(n)\right)$ where $n$ is the number of qubits. Given the well-known result of Babai, we exploit graph isomorphism to study the automorphisms of $G$ and arrive at an algorithm quasi-polynomial in $\lvert V\rvert$ for producing samples from the effective subspace eigenstates of $H$. Our results rule out exponential separations between stoquastic AQC and classical computation that arise from hidden symmetries in $k$-local Hamiltonians. Furthermore, our graph representation of $H$ is not limited to stoquastic Hamiltonians and may rule out corresponding obstructions in non-stoquastic cases, or be useful in studying additional properties of $k$-local Hamiltonians.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted